<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] IDN Representative
Hi Tim,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>
> Your two comments above have me concerned, and seem to conflict. I don't
> believe the current installed base of ad hoc IDN implementations should
have
> the consideration you imply.
As I have said in my previous message to Ross. I would not consider ad hoc
IDN implementations or testbeds as "installed base". I am more concerned
about the production systems around the world as well as the installed base
of existing DNS applications.
> Please keep in mind that first an foremost you
> represent registrars as a whole, not just those who have attempted their
own
> versions of an IDN implementation.
Understood. I think Ross put it well:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
> Lastly, please try to consider not so much what impact current
> registry/registrar technologies will have on committee's recommendations,
> but rather what impact the committee's recommendations will have on
current
> registry/registrar technologies. The difference is slight, but I strongly
> believe that the former approach will allow the GNSO to progressively
pursue
> appropriate plans that benefits industry over the long term.
Edmon
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|