<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] PersonalNames.com
> As a consultant to both Registrars and Afilias, would your
> proposal require me to step down from my position as Chair.
> Would this proposal require registrars that are directors or
> shareholders in registries to step down. How to do you define
> "proprietary information".
The motion would affect any representative of any registrar that has
possession of or access to Proprietary Information or Registry Sensitive
Information as defined in the various ICANN-gTLD contracts. I believe
that these definitions are concise, useful and uniform for our purposes.
If they lack uniformity, it should be a simple matter to choose one of
the more comprehensive ones.
It is my strongest position that we must move with intention and clarity
towards this goal of preserving the integrity and credibility of the
constituency and its positions.
-rwr
"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright
Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/blog
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael D. Palage [mailto:michael@palage.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:49 AM
> To: Ross Wm. Rader; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [registrars] PersonalNames.com
>
>
> Ross,
>
> As a consultant to both Registrars and Afilias, would your
> proposal require me to step down from my position as Chair.
> Would this proposal require registrars that are directors or
> shareholders in registries to step down. How to do you define
> "proprietary information".
>
> Just wondering?
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:03 AM
> > To: registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] PersonalNames.com
> >
> >
> > I would like to formally move that any representative of any ICANN
> > recognized gTLD registry in the possession of or with access to
> > registry Proprietary Information
> > (http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/name/registry-agmt-apph-06ma
> > r01.htm#A-
> > 3.1 in the case of GNR) or Registry Sensitive Information
> > (http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/name/registry-agmt-apph-06ma
> > r01.htm#A-
> > 3.2 also in the case of GNR) not be permitted to
> participate in this
> > constituency at any level, in any capacity, for a period of
> one year
> > since the last receipt of such information and that our by-laws be
> > amended to reflect this.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ross Wm. Rader
> > Tucows Inc.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>
> > To: <registrars@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:26 AM
> > Subject: [registrars] PersonalNames.com
> >
> >
> > > As PersonalNames is now an ICANN accredited registrar they are
> > eligible to
> > > subscribe to the registrar mailing list, and they have asked to
> > be added.
> > To
> > > date PersonalNames has not paid any membership dues so it is
> > not eligible
> > to
> > > vote in any constituency matters.
> > >
> > > Yesterday there were several posts asking the Registrar Executive
> > Committee
> > > to schedule a call with PersonalNames. Although the Executive
> > > Committee stands ready to assist the constituency in this
> matter, I
> > > believe that
> > some
> > > dialogue between PersonalNames and the rest of the registrar
> > > community
> > might
> > > make any such call more productive.
> > >
> > > The only PersonalNames representative that has asked to join
> > the registrar
> > > mailing list to date is Hakon Haugnes.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Michael D. Palage
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|