RE: [registrars] PersonalNames.com

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

> I support this position. I believe that it is completely 
> within our capabilities to clearly separate registrars from 
> those that work for registries and to have this constituency 
> membership only reflect registrars intrests.

Thanks for the note Rick. I would add to your statement that not only is
it within our realm of capability to draw these clear distinctions, but
it is vital to the interests of our respective registrar business
operations. Positive, determined action is required before the
credibility of the entire accreditation regime is undermined. We have a
unique opportunity to make a difference now - before it becomes a
serious issue.


                       -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/blog


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Rick Wesson
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:09 AM
> To: Ross Wm. Rader
> Cc: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [registrars] PersonalNames.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ross,
> 
> I support this position. I believe that it is completely 
> within our capabilities to clearly separate registrars from 
> those that work for registries and to have this constituency 
> membership only reflect registrars intrests.
> 
> best,
> 
> -rick
> 
> 
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> 
> > I would like to formally move that any representative of any ICANN 
> > recognized gTLD registry in the possession of or with access to 
> > registry Proprietary Information
> > 
> (http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/name/registry-agmt-apph-06mar01.
> > htm#A-
> > 3.1 in the case of GNR) or Registry Sensitive Information
> > 
> (http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/name/registry-agmt-apph-
> 06mar01.htm#A-
> > 3.2 also in the case of GNR) not be permitted to participate in this
> > constituency at any level, in any capacity, for a period of 
> one year since
> > the last receipt of such information and that our by-laws 
> be amended to
> > reflect this.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ross Wm. Rader
> > Tucows Inc.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>
> > To: <registrars@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:26 AM
> > Subject: [registrars] PersonalNames.com
> >
> >
> > > As PersonalNames is now an ICANN accredited registrar they are 
> > > eligible to subscribe to the registrar mailing list, and 
> they have 
> > > asked to be added.
> > To
> > > date PersonalNames has not paid any membership dues so it is not 
> > > eligible
> > to
> > > vote in any constituency matters.
> > >
> > > Yesterday there were several posts asking the Registrar Executive
> > Committee
> > > to schedule a call with PersonalNames. Although the Executive 
> > > Committee stands ready to assist the constituency in this 
> matter, I 
> > > believe that
> > some
> > > dialogue between PersonalNames and the rest of the registrar 
> > > community
> > might
> > > make any such call more productive.
> > >
> > > The only PersonalNames representative that has asked to join the 
> > > registrar mailing list to date is Hakon Haugnes.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Michael D. Palage
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
>