RE: [registrars] PersonalNames.com

[Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>]

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Michael D. Palage wrote:

> Rick,
>
> Has Alice Registry ever contacted any registries to solicite it services in
> connection with Fraudit?

sure, I've offered to run their names so they can assess potential
exposure and determine risk, I offered this in a private email to jeff
newman of .us, Since you sit on their policy council you probably knew
that.

In a private conversation with Hall Lubsen in Shanghai I discussed fraudit
with him but I haven't talked to him about it since, thanks for reminding
me to give them a call

So, whats with the finger pointing? Should the RC care about this?


> If Alice Registry was to provide this service to a registry would that bar
> your paricipation in the constiuency?

I doubt it. Fraudit is non-intrusive and can work from the public whois
Registries and Registrars can both benefit by using the technology to
mitigate fraud and their lower their charge back rates.

ok, I'll stop with the shameless plug...

I don't think selling a service like fraudit to a registry could give me
access to privileged information that the motion ross proposed would
prohibit.

any other questions Mr. Prosecutor?


-rick



> Mike
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Rick Wesson
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:09 AM
> > To: Ross Wm. Rader
> > Cc: registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] PersonalNames.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ross,
> >
> > I support this position. I believe that it is completely within our
> > capabilities to clearly separate registrars from those that work for
> > registries and to have this constituency membership only reflect
> > registrars intrests.
> >
> > best,
> >
> > -rick
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to formally move that any representative of any ICANN
> > > recognized gTLD registry in the possession of or with access to registry
> > > Proprietary Information
> > >
> > (http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/name/registry-agmt-apph-06ma
> > r01.htm#A-
> > > 3.1 in the case of GNR) or Registry Sensitive Information
> > >
> > (http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/name/registry-agmt-apph-06ma
> > r01.htm#A-
> > > 3.2 also in the case of GNR) not be permitted to participate in this
> > > constituency at any level, in any capacity, for a period of one
> > year since
> > > the last receipt of such information and that our by-laws be amended to
> > > reflect this.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Ross Wm. Rader
> > > Tucows Inc.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>
> > > To: <registrars@dnso.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:26 AM
> > > Subject: [registrars] PersonalNames.com
> > >
> > >
> > > > As PersonalNames is now an ICANN accredited registrar they
> > are eligible to
> > > > subscribe to the registrar mailing list, and they have asked
> > to be added.
> > > To
> > > > date PersonalNames has not paid any membership dues so it is
> > not eligible
> > > to
> > > > vote in any constituency matters.
> > > >
> > > > Yesterday there were several posts asking the Registrar Executive
> > > Committee
> > > > to schedule a call with PersonalNames. Although the Executive
> > Committee
> > > > stands ready to assist the constituency in this matter, I believe that
> > > some
> > > > dialogue between PersonalNames and the rest of the registrar community
> > > might
> > > > make any such call more productive.
> > > >
> > > > The only PersonalNames representative that has asked to join
> > the registrar
> > > > mailing list to date is Hakon Haugnes.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Michael D. Palage
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>