Re: [registrars] Not a problem

["Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>]

At 09:12 AM 3/11/03 -0800, Rick Wesson wrote:
>  Not only was the email based Votebot more cumbersome it was up to the 
> excom to tally the vote and could be easily manipulated.

Dear Rick:  That is patently false.

Dan's system is/was totally done for Excom and the full PAB membership with 
no hand work.  Further, the results were there for all to see and verify -- 
for months or years at a time.  Here are the results of a CORE votebot from 
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 16:41:29 -0700 (PDT):

         http://core.beach.net/votes/0006/

Click on "Finance WG Charter" and you see who voted for what:

         http://core.beach.net/votes/0006/6-0.html

Now, what makes you think the Excom could manipulate that vote.

And since when is $250/month less expensive than $100/ballot?  We don't 
have more than four or five votebots per *year*.

I totally disagree with you, Rick.

Sincerely, BobC







~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If something doesn't seem right, ask yourself whether you are a part of the 
*solution* --  or a part of the *problem*;-}