ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Initial Report


Tim - where is the mailing list archived for this task force? The last
reference that I find on the GNSO website is dated January 31, 2003.

Thanks in advance,

-rwr


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:04 AM
> To: 'GNSO Registrars'
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Initial Report
> 
> 
> I believe I will withdraw my request for a vote on this 
> report for now. The Task Force has already been back at it, 
> and we have agreed to mention the two additional issues that 
> are noted in the ballot below. However, they will not be 
> added as formal recommendations from the Task Force. I 
> believe this is a reasonable approach.
> 
> The final report is close to completion and may be ready to 
> post by the time we get this vote completed. So I think at 
> this point it would be best to hold off and vote on the final 
> report instead.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@godaddy.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 10:48 AM
> To: 'Tim Ruiz'; 'GNSO Registrars'
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Initial Report
> 
> I have let this set due to the recent votes. There have been 
> no other amendments to this ballot put forward. I would now 
> like to call for a vote on the ballot below.
> 
> Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:11 AM
> To: ross@tucows.com; 'GNSO Registrars'
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Intial Report
> 
> The amendment proposed by Ross has been incorporated into the 
> ballot below.
> 
> Discussion of the ballot should conclude on Sunday at 3:00PM 
> EST. Voting should open no later than Tuesday and close after 
> 48 hours. Rick, if I can assist in setting this up please let me know.
> 
> <ballot>
> 
> The GNSO Council's Deletes Task Force has issued its initial 
> report. This report addresses issues related to registrar and 
> registry deletion practices and makes three recommendations. 
> The result of this vote will be the basis for building an 
> official constituency position statement in response to the report.
> 
> Two additional recommendations related to the Deletes Task 
> Force work have been proposed based on discussions at the 
> recent joint Registrar-Registry Constituency meeting held in 
> Washington DC.
> 
> Recommendation to modify the registry auto-renew process:
> 
> On the day of expiration the domain enters the auto-renew 
> grace period (currently 45 days). The expiration date is NOT 
> advanced. The registrar is NOT charged.
> 
> On the last day of the auto-renew grace period, if the domain 
> has not been explicitly deleted or explicitly renewed, the 
> expiration date is advanced one year and the registrar is 
> charged for the renewal.
> 
> Recommendation to reinstate the 5-day pending grace period:
> 
> Domains deleted at any time other than during the Add Grace 
> Period enter a 5-day pending delete grace period after which 
> the domain is then placed in the Redemption Grace Period.
> 
> 
> [] I support the recommendations in the Deletes Task Force report;
> 
> [] I support the recommendations in the Deletes Task Force 
> report with the additional recommendations;
> 
> [] I cannot support the recommendations in the Deletes Task 
> Force report;
> 
> [] Abstain.
> 
> </ballot>
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:45 AM
> To: 'Tim Ruiz'; 'GNSO Registrars'
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Intial Report
> 
> Tucows happily seconds this motion and offers a friendly 
> amendment that the text of the ballot includes the substance 
> of the proposal set forth in DC rather than a reference to it.
> 
> We also propose that discussion on this ballot closes by the 
> end of this week (Sunday?) given the substantial discussion 
> that we have already devoted to the subject both on this list 
> and in DC.
> 
> 
> 
>                        -rwr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the 
> shore like an idiot."
> - Steven Wright
> 
> Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/
> 
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org
> > [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:52 PM
> > To: 'GNSO Registrars'
> > Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Intial Report
> > 
> > 
> > I formally move that we vote on the Deletes Task Force report
> > using the following ballot:
> > 
> > The GNSO Council's Deletes Task Force has issued its initial
> > report. This report addresses issues related to registrar and 
> > registry deletion practices and makes three recommendations. 
> > The result of this vote will be the basis for building an 
> > official constituency position statement in response to the report.
> > 
> > [] I support the recommendations in the Deletes Task Force
> > report; [] I support the recommendations in the Deletes Task 
> > Force report with the addition of recommendations to modify 
> > the registry auto-renew process and to reinstate the 5-day 
> > grace period after deletion of a domain name and prior to it 
> > entering the Redemption Grace Period, both as discussed at 
> > the recent joint Registrar-Registry Constituency meeting held 
> > in Washington DC; [] I cannot support the recommendations in 
> > the Deletes Task Force report; [] Abstain.
> > 
> > A supporting document will be listed under Referenced Items,
> > and will read as follows:
> > 
> > Modified registry auto-renew process:
> > 
> > On the day of expiration the domain enters the auto-renew
> > grace period (currently 45 days). The expiration date is NOT 
> > advanced. The registrar is NOT charged.
> > 
> > On the last day of the auto-renew grace period, if the domain
> > has not been explicitly deleted or explicitly renewed, the 
> > expiration date is advanced one year and the registrar is 
> > charged for the renewal.
> > 
> > Reinstating the 5-day pending grace period:
> > 
> > Domains deleted at any time other than during the Add Grace
> > Period enter a 5-day pending delete grace period (currently 
> > missing) after which the domain is then placed in the 
> > Redemption Grace Period.
> > 
> > Discussion? Second?
> > 
> > Tim
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org
> > [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf > Of Tim Ruiz
> > 
> > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 6:17 PM
> > To: GNSO Registrars
> > Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Intial Report
> > 
> > The public comment period for the initial report closes on
> > March 3rd. We briefly discussed the report at the RC meeting 
> > in DC, which resulted in the raising of a related but 
> > separate issue. There have been no other comments from 
> > registrars regarding the initial report.
> > 
> > I would like to request at this time that we proceed with a
> > vote on the Deletes TF Initial Report, after which we will 
> > work on producing a position statement in response to the report.
> > 
> > Rick, will you need a formal motion and second to get this started?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Tim
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 6:48 AM
> > To: registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Intial Report
> > 
> > 
> > I failed to notify the list that the Deletes Task Force
> > Initial Report has been posted and is open for public comment 
> > until March 3, 2003.
> > 
> > The report is posted at:
> > http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20030211.Delete>
> sTF-initial-report.html
> > 
> > Comments should be submitted to:
> > comments-deletes@dnso.org
> > 
> > The comment archive is available at:
> > http://www.dnso.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments> -deletes/Arc02/
> > 
> > Tim
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>