DNSO Archives: [registrars]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar

To: Tim Ruiz <tim@godaddy.com>, ross@tucows.com, "'Registrars Mail List'" <registrars@dnso.org>
Subject: RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar
From: Jim Archer <jarcher@registrationtek.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 18:43:21 -0400
cc: "'Registrars Executive Committee'" <rc-excom@ar.com>
In-Reply-To: <008e01c30b63$99a04070$fa05a8c0@TIMRUIZ>
References: <008e01c30b63$99a04070$fa05a8c0@TIMRUIZ>
Reply-To: Jim Archer <jarcher@registrationtek.com>
Sender: owner-registrars@dnso.org

--On Friday, April 25, 2003 2:48 PM -0500 Tim Ruiz <tim@godaddy.com> wrote:

> To continue to deny it membership simply because it has the same parent
> company is short sighted, unrealistic, and a little bit paranoid.

Tim, I see your point.  Perhaps we should offer each registrar 1 vote for 
each domain name they sponsor.  Would you support this proposal?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar
  - From: Paul Westley <paul@internetters.co.uk>
- RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar
  - From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>

References:
- RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar
  - From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>
- RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar
  - From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>