RE: [registrars] Deletes Implementation Committee?

["Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>]

Hello Ross,

Wearing my hat as GNSO chair, it is on my list to do.

I have corresponded via email with the Deletes Task Force chair, and had
suggested we use a similar membership to the Transfers or WHOIS
implementation committee.

What I had planned to do, was create a first draft of an implementation
committee report and hold a teleconference sending an invite to the
members of the last implementation committee.  I have just been a bit
snowed under lately.

If any registrar would like to be involved in the implementation
discussion then please let me know.

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, 4 May 2003 12:30 AM
> To: registrars@dnso.org
> 
> In the course of getting caught up with the comings and 
> goings of the GNSO Council, I came across the following 
> snippet in the minutes of their April
> 17 meeting. What is the current status of this effort? Who is 
> representing registrar interests on this committee? How are 
> they taking input? Are they going to meet their deadlines?
> 
> Thanks in advance to anyone that can shed light on this effort.
> 
> --
> 
> Discussion highlighted the value of an implementation group 
> being formed, composed of Registrars, Registries, task force 
> members and ICANN Staff which would provide feedback to the 
> task force. Taking into account the critical nature of 
> deleting a domain name, the process should be correct and the 
> possible timeframe considered for the report to be voted on 
> by Council was the June 2003 meeting in Montreal.
> Bruce Tonkin seconded by Ken Stubbs, proposed:
> 
> *         That the Chair of the GNSO Council would liaise 
> with the Chair of
> the Deletes Task Force for the creation of an implementation 
> group and the implementation group would provide input to the 
> Deletes Task Force.
> 
> *         The Deletes task force would have 2 weeks to 
> assimilate the input
> received and present the revised Final Report to be voted on 
> by the Council.
> 
> Vote: Unanimous support of voting Council members
> 
> 
> 
>