<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Montreal meeting
Ross,
With all due respect, the entire GNSO policy is directed at dealing with
gTLD's (not ccTLD's).
Are you suggesting that you would never have an opinion on a new Registry
product ? That the GNSO should never be involved ? That WLS for example
does not concern you because it is a product and not "policy" ?
However, I do concur that you should be able to leave the room if you are
not interested. I am ameanable to booking them during a break or in such a
way that you can bail if you want. I would just want to see gTLD's given
priority over ccTLD's and that we should accomidate them if possible.
Rob.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:12 AM
To: Rob Hall
Cc: Rick Wesson; Registrars List
Subject: Re: [registrars] Montreal meeting
On 6/6/2003 9:00 AM Rob Hall noted that:
> Why gTLD and not ccTLD ?
>
> Mainly because we are all accredited for gTLD work. That is really what
> ICANN does for us. We have a closer relationship with gTLD's. If they
are
> introducing new services, such as WLS, I know I want to hear about it, and
> it seems the perfect place to do it. While I suspect not everyone in the
> room cares about some of the obscure ccTLD's, I bet most care about
anything
> of consequence happening at the gTLD's.
>
> That said, I don't want the typical marketing crap of why their domain is
> better. That they can do one on one. But if they are asking for time to
> present something new, or give us an update, I welcome it. Seems it saves
> everyone time.
My responsibility is GNSO policy - not gTLD products. There are numerous
others in our constituency in the same position. At the very least, we
should segregate the agenda in such a way that those that want to
participate can and those that don't can bail.
-rwr
"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright
Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|