RE: [registrars] Montreal meeting

["Rob Hall" <rob@momentous.com>]

Ross,

In an earlier email I said

"That said, I don't want the typical marketing crap of why their domain is
better.  That they can do one on one.  But if they are asking for time to
present something new, or give us an update, I welcome it.  Seems it saves
everyone time."

I think we are basically agreeing here.  I don't want the marketing crap.
But I do want anything new on the product/policy side that affects us to be
presented.

Rob.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:37 AM
To: Rob Hall
Cc: Registrars List
Subject: Re: [registrars] Montreal meeting


On 6/6/2003 10:21 AM Rob Hall noted that:

> Ross,
>
> With all due respect, the entire GNSO policy is directed at dealing with
> gTLD's (not ccTLD's).

Lets cut to the chase...

I'm not talking about ccTLDs or even gTLDs specifically. I'm talking
about the mind-numbing waste of time registry sales pitches that have
*nothing* to do with GNSO policy matters.

As far as scheduling goes, pitches shouldn't be on the agenda, and if
they are they should be segregated as heavily as possible to allow our
constituency to focus our attention in a meaningful way.


                        -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/