Re: [registrars] Montreal meeting

["Joyce Lin" <joyce@007names.com>]

Can ccTLD arrange their own separate meeting(s) and invite registrars to
attend? Those who find their topics interesting will go.

Joyce Lin
007names



----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
To: "Rob Hall" <rob@momentous.com>
Cc: "Rick Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>; "Registrars List" <Registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [registrars] Montreal meeting


> On 6/6/2003 9:00 AM Rob Hall noted that:
>
> > Why gTLD and not ccTLD ?
> >
> > Mainly because we are all accredited for gTLD work.  That is really what
> > ICANN does for us.  We have a closer relationship with gTLD's.   If they
are
> > introducing new services, such as WLS, I know I want to hear about it,
and
> > it seems the perfect place to do it.  While I suspect not everyone in
the
> > room cares about some of the obscure ccTLD's, I bet most care about
anything
> > of consequence happening at the gTLD's.
> >
> > That said, I don't want the typical marketing crap of why their domain
is
> > better.  That they can do one on one.  But if they are asking for time
to
> > present something new, or give us an update, I welcome it.  Seems it
saves
> > everyone time.
>
> My responsibility is GNSO policy - not gTLD products. There are numerous
> others in our constituency in the same position. At the very least, we
> should segregate the agenda in such a way that those that want to
> participate can and those that don't can bail.
>
>
>
>
>                         -rwr
>
>
>
>
> "There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
> idiot."
> - Steven Wright
>
> Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/
>
>
>
>
>