<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Interesting WHOIS stats at directNIC
Title: Message
Gary,
that
comparison is a good idea....
But
(big but) their port-43 replies with whois information for other
registrar's names.
I just
looked up enom.com and register.com at whois.networksolutions.com (port 43) and
it replied with the whois.
Therefore, the 'typed code' on their website won't
help.
Paul
Well
NSI have just implemented the need for a 'typed code' in their
public whois, which I would assume restrictions any automation. So I guess we
should compare the stats in a month's time :)
Or,
one could argue, a third party, who is not being throttled by NSI, is
using NSI's whois
lookup service to obtain information from directNIC in an automated
fashion
NSI
recurse lookups to the sponsoring registrar when someone runs a query on their
whois. One could argue that they are helping you market your brand and helping
to provide a service to the general Internet community.
This is our stats on directNIC
for the month of May 2003.
Top Ten abusers of
whois.directnic.com for the month of May 2003 |
IP
Address |
Total WHOIS
looks |
Percentage of
Total |
Host
Name |
Owns IP
Block |
216.168.229.6 |
153613 |
9.650% |
N/A |
Network
Solutions, Inc. |
207.189.98.50 |
63056 |
3.961% |
apps.snapnames.com |
|
204.251.10.43 |
47614 |
2.991% |
web3.directnic.com
(Us) |
|
207.44.212.82 |
45410 |
2.853% |
N/A |
Everyones
Internet, Inc.(Rackshack) |
216.21.228.13 |
24709 |
1.552% |
N/A |
Register.com,
Inc |
208.252.207.96 |
13591 |
0.854% |
ernst.vab.com |
|
63.115.144.6 |
12315 |
0.774% |
user6.esconett.org |
|
62.146.33.50 |
11054 |
0.694% |
www.united-domains.de |
|
212.53.64.228 |
10497 |
0.659% |
prodwebapp2.netnames.com |
|
209.25.140.20 |
10484 |
0.659% |
snarf.alldomains.com |
|
Total WHOIS
Queries for the month of May 2003 |
1591884 |
Total Unique
IP Addresses |
41532 |
Now why in the world would Network Solutions do
153,613 WHOIS queries in a month? Your guess is as good as mine, I
took at look at about 20 of the domains they queried and none of them were
transferred from Network Solutions. We had a few from register.com and
a few from openSRS, but more than 50% of the domains were new registrations
with us. The strange part is they weren't new registrations in May or
even April.
So if somebody from Network Solution would be kind
enough to explain why we have 153 thousand whois queries against us I will
be more than happy to continue to provide them with port 43 access from that
IP address. Otherwise, since I consider this to be spam, and I will be
shutting down access to that IP address. Because for all I know
Network Solutions may be the ones selling email addresses to all of the
spammers.
Donny Simonton
directNIC.com
This email has been scanned for viruses by
NetBenefit using Sophos anti-virus technology
|
This email has been scanned for viruses by
NetBenefit using Sophos anti-virus technology |
This email has been scanned for viruses by
NetBenefit using Sophos anti-virus technology
|
This email has been scanned for viruses by
NetBenefit using Sophos anti-virus technology
|
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|