<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Regarding Tom Keller nomination to the GNSO WHOIS privacy steering group
Hello,
I would like to thank Paul for the nomination and Bruce for the second
and herewith accept the nomination for the whois steering group.
Please find my disclosure of interest below:
I am under contract with Schlund + Partner AG which is a global
registrar of domain names in gTLDs and ccTLDs and one of Germany
biggest webhosting companies.
Schlund + Partner AG has a 8.6% shareholding in Afilias for investment
purposes. Schlund + Partner AG has no role in software development nor
operations for Afilias.
I don't hold any other offices and are not affiliated to any other
company.
Best,
tom
--
Thomas Keller
Domain Services
Schlund + Partner AG
Brauerstrasse 48 Tel. +49-721-91374-534
76135 Karlsruhe, Germany Fax +49-721-91374-215
http://www.schlund.de tom@schlund.de
Am 09.06.2003 schrieb Bruce Tonkin:
> I second the nomination.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> Member of the registrars constituency
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Westley [mailto:paul@internetters.co.uk]
> > Sent: Saturday, 7 June 2003 4:24 AM
> > To: Bruce Tonkin
> > Cc: registrars@dnso.org; Tom Keller; Rick Wesson
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] Representation on the GNSO WHOIS
> > privacy steering group
> >
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I would like to nominate Tom Keller of Schlund as one of our
> > representatives on the GNSO WHOIS privacy steering group. As
> > a European and
> > someone who is very experienced in domain name issues and
> > well versed in
> > the European data protection regulations, Tom is ideally
> > suited to provide
> > a balanced view of the WHOIS privacy issue. He has been active in the
> > Registrars' Constituency for a number of years and with his
> > current GNSO
> > membership, I can highly recommend him for this role.
> >
> > Paul Westley
> > Internetters
> >
> > At 09:00 06/06/03, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
> > >Hello All,
> > >
> > >The GNSO Council has requested that each constituency
> > nominate one or
> > >two representatives to the GNSO WHOIS privacy steering group. Note
> > >this steering group is not responsible for policy development. Its
> > >role is to take the large number of issues of the ICANN
> > Staff Managers
> > >report on Privacy and develop terms of reference for one or
> > more task
> > >forces to carry out policy development. These terms of
> > reference will
> > >need to be approved by the GNSO Council before policy
> > development can
> > >take place.
> > >
> > >The preference is to appoint the representatives prior to
> > the Montreal
> > >meeting.
> > >
> > >Given that the representatives will not be "elected
> > officers" under the
> > >new registrar by-laws, I assume we can have a fast track process for
> > >appointment. Remember that the steering group does not
> > itself develop
> > >or approve policy.
> > >
> > >I recommend a 7 day nomination period and a 7 day voting period.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Bruce Tonkin
> > >Registrars Rep on the GNSO Council
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Bruce Tonkin
> > >Sent: Friday, 6 June 2003 5:29 PM
> > >To: council@dnso.org
> > >Subject: [council] WHOIS Privacy steering group
> > >
> > >
> > >Hello All,
> > >
> > >Just a reminder that all constituencies should appoint one or two
> > >members to the WHOIS privacy steering group prior to the Montreal
> > >meeting. It is probably preferable if those members will be
> > attending
> > >the Montreal meeting to gain the most benefit from the public forum,
> > >and the opportunity for the steering group to meet in-person at
> > >Montreal.
> > >
> > >Please inform the GNSO Secretariat of the appointments so that a
> > >mailing list can be set up.
> > >
> > >The ALAC and the GAC may appoint one or two (non-voting) liaisons to
> > >the Steering Group. The ccNSO would also be welcome to nominate an
> > >informal liaison also.
> > >
> > >The objective of the steering group is to:
> > >- examine the Staff Manager's report on WHOIS Privacy
> > >- review the factual presentations of the ICANN public forum
> > on WHOIS
> > >in Montreal
> > >- develop recommendations, for the GNSO Council to approve,
> > to form a
> > >small number (e.g less than 5) of Task Forces to carry out
> > the policy
> > >development process on the major issues identified in the Staff
> > >manager's report (it should be possible to group some of the related
> > >issues for examination within a single task force)
> > >- the recommendations should incorporate for each task force
> > a terms of
> > >reference in accordance with the ICANN bylaws (Annex A,
> > Section 7(b)):
> > >
> > >" Such Charter will include:
> > >
> > >1. the issue to be addressed by the task force, as such issue was
> > >articulated for the vote before the Council that commenced the PDP;
> > >
> > >2. the specific timeline that the task force must adhere to, as set
> > >forth below, unless the Board determines that there is a compelling
> > >reason to extend the timeline; and
> > >
> > >3. any specific instructions from the Council for the task force,
> > >including whether or not the task force should solicit the advice of
> > >outside advisors on the issue."
> > >
> > >- if the steering group recommends more than two task forces
> > be created
> > >it should recommend to the GNSO Council an order in which the task
> > >force work should be done, and an approximate timeframe for
> > when each
> > >task force will commence and finish
> > >
> > >Council members and Steering Group members might like to review the
> > >IETF standard RFC2418 on IETF Working Group Guidelines and
> > Procedures
> > >(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2418.txt). The standard documents best
> > >practice within the IETF in forming working groups and defining
> > >charters. Section 2.1 (criteria for forming a working group) and
> > >Section 2.2
> > >(Charter) are particularly relevant.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Bruce Tonkin
> > >GNSO Council Chair
> >
> >
>
>
Gruss,
tom
(__)
(OO)_____
(oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of
| |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger!
w w w w
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|