[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[registrars] RE: [registrar] FW: Proposed Domain Name Dispute Policy
I just saw this on the Register.com Web site:
'Please note: register.com's phone number is not published on the web site
because we are required to document each correspondence in a written format,
per ICANN guidelines.'
Hello? Can Register.com or ICANN or anyone else explain how this
interpretation comes about? I cannot for a moment believe that we are going
to have a situation where all 'ICANN accredited' Registrars cannot publish
their phone numbers on the Web site. We do a huge part of our business by
phone.
Thanks,
Ivan
Ivan Pope
NetNames
Managing Your Internet Identity
http://www.netnames.com
180-182 Tottenham Court Road
London, W1P 9LE
+44 171 291 3900
+44 171 291 3939 (Fax)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew McLaughlin [mailto:mclaughlin@pobox.com]
> Sent: 22 June 1999 19:05
> To: registrar@registrar.icann.org
> Subject: [registrar] FW: Proposed Domain Name Dispute Policy
>
>
> In case anyone on this list has not seen the following:
>
> --Andrew
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: testbed-return-42-mclaughlin=pobox.com@registrar.icann.org
> [mailto:testbed-return-42-mclaughlin=pobox.com@registrar.icann.org] On
> Behalf Of JIMBRAMSON@aol.com
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 1999 7:49 PM
> To: registrars@dnso.org; testbed@registrar.icann.org
> Cc: Louis_L._Touton@jonesday.com; rforman@register.com;
> lgaviser@register.com; rrodin@skadden.com; slevi@skadden.com
> Subject: Proposed Domain Name Dispute Policy
>
>
> To all Testbed and Post-Testbed Registrars:
>
> Attached please find a draft Domain Name Dispute Policy that
> was prepared by
> our counsel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. The draft
> is based upon
> Annex IV to the Final Report on the WIPO Domain Name Process,
> but is written
> in an informal style intended to be more accessible to the
> average consumer.
> In particular, the attached draft policy incorporates WIPO's concepts
> regarding arbitration for the narrow category of disputes relating to
> abusive
> registration and the limited remedies available through the
> arbitration
> process. This draft policy does not include WIPO's
> suggestions regarding
> exclusions of "famous marks." Since the use of "famous mark"
> exclusions is
> still a hotly contested issue, we believe that WIPO's
> proposal should not be
> adopted until there is a broader consensus on this issue.
>
> As you know, ICANN has passed a resolution that there should
> be a unified
> domain name dispute policy. We are therefore soliciting
> comments on this
> draft from the other accredited registrars. In order to complete this
> policy
> for use by the testbed registrars as soon as possible, we are
> asking that
> all
> comments be provided to us no later than Friday, June 25. We are also
> asking
> that each registrar submit no more than one set of comments,
> to streamline
> the process. All comments should be sent to RRODIN@SKADDEN.COM and
> SLEVI@SKADDEN.COM. Skadden will then circulate a revised policy
> incorporating comments received from the other registrars,
> and identifying
> any points not incorporated and the reason for not including
> them (e.g., in
> the event of disagreement among registrars).
>
> Please note that AOL and register.com have paid for the
> creation of this
> draft policy without any contribution from any other
> registrar. Since we
> are
> opening up this work product to solicit your feedback with the goal of
> developing a policy that will be acceptable to and uniformly
> adopted by all
> of the registrars, we are asking that all participating registrars
> contribute
> to the work Skadden will undertake going forward to review
> and incorporate
> your respective comments. We are asking that each registrar
> who submits
> comments or who expects to adopt the policy that is being created,
> contribute
> $1,000 towards this effort. Payments should be payable to
> America Online,
> Inc. and sent to Jim Bramson, America Online, Inc., 22000 AOL
> Way, Dulles,
> VA
> 20166. Once the project is completed, if the registrars have
> collectively
> contributed more than necessary to cover Skadden's bills, we
> will provide
> pro
> rata reimbursements, or at the contributors' request, donate
> the excess
> funds
> to the Registrar Constituency.
>
> Please contact us with any questions you may have. Thank you for your
> cooperation.
>
> Jim Bramson (AOL)
> Rich Forman (register.com)
>