RE: [registrars] Examples of tiering

["Richard Forman" <rforman@register.com>]

I agree, but also notice that tiering is good for the larger members in each
category both X, Y and above Y.


Richard D. Forman
President & CEO
Register.com, Inc.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Larry Erlich
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 1999 7:50 PM
> To: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Examples of tiering
>
>
> Richard Forman wrote:
> >
> > I have gotten some questions about just how tiering would work.
>  I can think
> > of one example and hopefully some of you can think of some
> others.  Here it
> > goes:
> >
> > Volume of registrations per quarter (3 months)          Fee
> paid to ICANN
> > 0 to X registrations                       $A (fixed, not variable)
> > X-1 to Y registrations                     $B (fixed, not variable)
> > above Y registrations                      $C (fixed, not variable)
> >
> > Richard D. Forman
> > President & CEO
> > Register.com,  Inc.
>
> I just ran over to CompUSA and ran an analysis of the above
> on one of the G4 "SuperComputerOnAChip" Macintoshes.
>
> The answer came back: tiering is only a good idea if
> you are one of the largest "Y" registrars. I say 100% variable
> is the way to go.
>
> Larry Erlich
>
http://www.DomainRegistry.com
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Erlich - DomainRegistry.com - NetScott Operations
215-244-6700 - FAX:215-244-6605 - Reply:erlich@domainregistry.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------