Re: [registrars] SLA - Decision Time

["Francois Collignon" <collignon@7ways.net>]

Hello,

7ways support option 1.


Best regards,
francois
>
>
>"Michael D. Palage" wrote:
>
>> I would like feedback on the following issue. The SLA Task Force working
>in
>> conjunction with NSI "the registry" drafted a SLA which was circulated
>among
>> the list a few weeks back. After the initial circulation there was some
>> concerns raised by a couple of registrars that this agreement was not
>> adequate enough.  The crossroads which we are now at requires us to
either
>> accept this SLA with the current built in re-negotiation periods at the
>> initial 6 month mark and then annually thereafter, or forego any SLA
until
>> such time that more accurate metrixs can be defined.
>>
>> Your choices:
>> (1) Adopted the SLA in its current form with a re-evaluation at a 6 month
>> mark;
>> Pros: We have something to start with as opposed to nothing; the majority
>of
>> the Task Force thought it was an acceptable first try with the condition
>> that it be revisited at the designated periods of time
>> Cons: Once you establish a benchmark it will be difficult to raise the
>bar;
>> (2) Enter into no agreement until further comparative metrixs can be
>> reviewed
>> Pros: It will allow for a more accurate measurement of what the SLA
should
>> be. A significant amount of consumer complaints have involved
>> SRS downtime and other performance issues
>> Cons: There will be no SLA in place to hold NSI accountable.
>> (3) Abstain
>>
>> If you could respond as quickly as possible I would greatly appreciate
it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> P.S. I will be circulating a draft agenda item for the Cairo meeting
>> shortly. Any topics that people would like to see addressed please
forward
>> them to me.
>
>--
>_/_/_/interQ Incorporated
>_/_/_/System Division
>_/_/_/Director and General Manager
>_/_/_/Richard A. S. Lindsay
>