Re: [registrars] Moving the gTLD debate forward...

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@dninet.net>]

i would have to strongly concur with paul here.
i also feel that it is essential that the council needs to move the ball
foward and avoid any delays.

i will be & have been working towards that goal as well.

ken stubbs


----- Original Message -----
From: Paul M. Kane <Paul.Kane@REACTO.com>
To: Timothy Denton <tmdenton@magma.ca>
Cc: Louis Touton <touton@icann.org>; <registrars@dnso.org>;
<edyson@edventure.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [registrars] Moving the gTLD debate forward...


> Tim,
>
> Timothy Denton wrote:
>
> > Paul:
> >
> > I again smell bad faith in proposals of the sort that say: "well, WG-B
could
> > not come up with consensus on tghe means for the protection of famous
names
> > so we obviously cannot have new TLD's."
>
> What's your mission, ...... to stall the whole debate????
>
> I don't smell that aroma ....and to make sure, I think it would be prudent
for
> the NC to keep the ball moving forward by recognizing the areas of
consensus and
> giving a broad and positive path for the Board to consider the
introduction of
> new gTLDs..... in the knowledge they have the full support of the
Registrar
> constituency... .
>
> If you want to wait until WG B comes to consensus, or prefer the NC to
bring the
> current consensus points together in a manner that the Board can take it
to the
> next stage.. please state your preference??  The reason for asking the
question
> is to specifically avoid the "smell" and to send a clear message to the
Board
> that they should move forward with this most pressing issue.
>
> Since my earlier mail I have received a significant number of private
emails
> requesting me to vote in a manner that moves the debate move forward, if
you
> want to stall the debate, please say so, justifying your reasons.  I
welcome
> your feedback.
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul
>
>
>