[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [registrars] I thought this was looked down on?
I
would tend to think this facilitates and promotes cybersquatting.
No?
Why?
Jeff
At 10:22
AM 5/30/00 , Josh Elliott wrote:
Creative, but probably something we need to
address in the COC.
Josh
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of
Bryan Evans
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 7:12 AM
> To: Jeff
Shrewsbury Info Avenue; Len; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: RE:
[registrars] I thought this was looked down on?
>
>
>
Actually, this is technically OK, because those nameservers do
> exist
and they really are the servers for that domain. It may
> not be
what some of us think is in the best interests of the
> DNS community,
but it is compliant with the rules. Got to hand
> it to them,
it's creative.
>
> -Bryan
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of
Jeff Shrewsbury Info Avenue
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 7:27
AM
> To: Len; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [registrars] I
thought this was looked down on?
>
>
>
Len:
>
> I would think this is a clear violation of the
agreements because this
> WHOIS output does not list the true
nameservers. Agree?
>
> What are the sanctions for such a
violation? Or will we have to wait until
> the compliance liasion gets
further along to find out?
>
> js
>
>
> At
03:18 PM 5/28/00 -0600, Len wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
>
> This is a nice
practice!
> >
> >
> > Domain Name:
W7X.COM
> > Registrar: ALABANZA, INC.
>
> Whois Server: whois.bulkregister.com
>
> Referral URL: www.bulkregister.com
> > Name
Server: NS1.TO-BUY-THIS-DOMAIN-FAX-305-463-9709.COM
> >
Name Server: NS3.THIS-DOMAIN-IS-FOR-SALE.COM
> > Name
Server: NS2.EMAILUS-DOMAINSALESATDOMAINCOLLECTION.COM
>
> Updated Date: 27-apr-2000
> >
> >
>
>len
> >
> >
>
--
jeff
field
founder/chairman
http://namesecure.com
IT ALL STARTS WITH A WEB
ADDRESS
tel: (925) 363-6606
fax: (925) 363-6699