[comments-review] Fwd: [ncdnhc-discuss] comment: NC Task Forces

[Adam Peake <ajp@glocom.ac.jp>]

>To: discuss@icann-ncc.org
>From: Adam Peake <ajp@glocom.ac.jp>
>Subject: [ncdnhc-discuss] comment: NC Task Forces
>Sender: discuss-admin@icann-ncc.org
>
>http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20011011.NCteleconf-minutes.html
>
>>NC Task Forces
>>
>>-NC review interim report: Philip Sheppard said that this report was
>>now being circulated for public comment until October 28 when the TF
>>would look at the comments and produce the final report to be
>>submitted to the NC on November 4 2001.
>
>
>My comment:
>
>The task force system should be abolished and all DNSO policy making
>conducted through the open processes: working groups.
>
>Best I remember there was no support for the creation of these small
>closed Names Council driven "task forces" in the public DNSO review.
>The DNSO working group D (Bret Fausett) did not recommend the
>adoption of these closed and controlled groups.
>
>- - - -


>Thanks,
>
>Adam
>
>Adam Peake
>GLOCOM Tokyo
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss@icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss