<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[comments-whois] [Fwd: WHOIS: Process and Substance] - follow-up
Dear ICANN
I am aware that the comment to the WHOIS paper was not received during
8th November, a it should have.
I finished it at 18:46 yesterday - 8th November - and as we are GMT -7
it would have been in time had I been able to send it. But my connection
to the Internet was not working - I do not know why. Now, a couple of
minutes ago, I was able to send it.
Now I would like to ask you to still accept it - but if you cannot,
because you are mechanically sgrict (without considering technical
deficiencies in a situation like mine in Cambodia), I would appreciate
if you could let me know by e-mail.
Thanks for your attention,
Norbert Klein
Open Forum of Cambodia
Member of the Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency
Phnom Penh
Cambodia
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: WHOIS: Process and Substance
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 18:46:09 +0700
From: Norbert Klein <nhklein@gmx.net>
To: comments-whois@dnso.org
The ICANN Reform Process, triggered by Stewart Lynn's paper "ICANN - The
Case for Reform" stated: "Undue focus on process to the exclusion of
substance and effectiveness is the second major problem facing ICANN."
(snip)
...
Norbert Klein
Phnom Penh
Open Forum of Cambodia
Member of the Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|