Re: [ifwp] Re: Monterrey Report

[Michael Sondow <msondow@iciiu.org>]

Martin B. Schwimmer a écrit:
> 
> >The DNSO proposal eventually accepted by the
> >Board should have the support of all the stakeholders - instead of scaring
> >away key stakeholders with thoughts of an automatic minority share, instead
> >create a structure that will sell all stakeholders on a DNSO that is not
> >"captured" by individual constituencies.

I'm a little confused by this. How does equal representation by all
constituencies
on the names Council create an automatic minority share?

(BTW, these lists have got me bamboozled. This is the first message I've
gotten on any of them
for quite a while, except for kent's messages about the meeting notes.
Anyway, wouldn't it be better to post to the "participants" list? There,
at least, there's some chance of catching a few people who were at the
meeting. This "discuss" list hasn't kicked off at all, it seems to me.)