[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ifwp] How not to define membership classes



At 07:34 31/12/98 -0500, Milton Mueller  wrote:
>I hope I am not the only one who is aware of, and concerned about, the
>blatant
>special interest power grab that makes up a major part of the INTA
>proposal for a
>domain name supporting organization.
>
>(See http://www.dnso.org/docs/dnso-draft-inta-bylaws.html)
>
<good arguments snipped for brevity>

Milton and all,

Well observed.  But even before the INTA- grab I had a concern about how the dnso.org created constituencies and was horse-trading with the ccTLD registries about them.

In my view special interest constituencies should be avoided altogether.
My ideas for a broad membership for ICANN follow below.
( on the web at http://www.democracy.org.nz/model.html)

Although ICANN is the most important organisation to have a broad membership structure,
I am posting it as part of this thread on DNSO constituencies, because of the relevance of the single-constituency idea.
Sorry for the lenght and Happy New Year to you all.

Proposed Model of a limited
                      Cyber Democracy

                                         Introduction

                      The most stable structure is the structure with the
                      broadest base.

                      At the base of the membership organisation that is to be
                      ICANN should be a membership of at least a 100
                      -500.000 individuals, not mere thousands or tens of
                      thousands.

                      This avoids the pitfalls of having to accept organisations
                      as constituents and the resulting bickering about how to
                      weigh their vote or input.

                      A large organisation of individuals is also the best
                      guardian against capture by any specific interest group.

                      There is no need to re-invent democracy, but there is
                      an opportunity to go back to purer forms, without
                      giving in to demands for districts, regional
                      representatives, special interest representatives and
                      other attempts at gerrymandering of constituencies.

                      Athenian democracy is a good model, suitable to serve
                      as a basis from which the structure of cyber democracy
                      can be allowed to evolve without inviting the chaos of a
                      People's Republic of racketeers, demagogues or bullies.

                      The limitation that I would propose on the total
                      numbers is a qualification for membership: the
                      individual ownership of a Domain Name.Company
                      Domains are represented by one company representative.

                      Those who wish to participate in the governance of the
                      Names and Numbers should at least have Names or
                      Numbers.

                      This means that I am not proposing a People's Republic
                      of all users , but a limited democracy of the property
                      owners and the taxpayers.

                      This democracy is simply there to protect them and
                      their property from registry rackets that now have
                      monopoly power to make, interpret and enforce rules
                      that affect them.

                      The at-large users should not be ignored and the
                      Democracy should be tasked with drafting rules for
                      petitions and on-line referenda to consult the at-large
                      users from time to time.

                      The first task however, is to stop the fights for control
                      and replace them with a fair and orderly process.

                      How the get the members.

                      Existing Domain Name owners should be invited to join
                      via email. Although this will involve mass emailing, as it
                      concerns an offering of Rights this can be considered
                      acceptable.

                      All TLD Registries or their registrars should offer an
                      ICANN membership option upon renewal or
                      registration of each Domain Name (one membership
                      per individual, not per Domain Name) by way of a tick
                      box or a line in an email template.

                      The membership fee should be nominal, say, not more
                      than 5 dollars.

                      

                     
Members' Rights of participation and election of
                      representatives

                      Members form a large collective gathering in the form
                      of a members mailing list, the general convention.

                      The rules for behaviour on this list will be established
                      first by the membership advisory committee and voted
                      on in the first general meeting.

                      They should include rules for acceptable behaviour and
                      ostracism for shorter or longer duration to combat
                      disruptive behaviour.

                      Each individual on this mailing list will have the right to
                      post his opinions and run for elective office.

                      Initially, the general convention itself has to assume the
                      rights and duties of a parliament.

                      As soon as the membership has reached 100.000, the
                      general convention elects a parliament of 25
                      representatives.

                      This number is only increased when the membership
                      exceeds 500.000 or when the general convention would
                      ask for it.

                      Voting takes place twice a year to ensure responsive
                      behaviour of the elected in the face of fast paced
                      development and change.

                      Voting can be exercised by way of multiple preferential
                      voting, giving the maximum of input per vote.

                      This parliament will have rule making powers and it's
                      deliberations will be public.

                      All this will cost money, but the Domain Name owners
                      will have to consider this as an insurance and an
                      alternative to government mandated bureaucracy or
                      dictatorship, that could cost them a lot more in the long
                      run.

                    

                     



--Joop--
http://www.democracy.org.nz/