[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ifwp] Re: Evidence of DNSO.ORG closed dealings?

At 02:18 AM 1/8/99 -0500, Jay Fenello wrote:
>At 1/8/99, 12:02 AM, Einar Stefferud wrote:
>>There is some confustion here;-)...
>>
>>The <participants@dsno.og> mailing list passed into disuse just about
>>the time that Joe Sims was added, in part because of the controversy
>>that arose because Joe Sims was added, and in part because the
>>drafting work of the list was done and complete, and it was time to
>>move out to the <discuss@dnso.org> list.
>>
>>So, let's not go overboard here.  We are having enough trouble
>>maintaining the canoe in its upright configuration!
>>
>>Cheers...\Stef
>
>
>Hi Stef,
>
>Unfortunately, that is not correct :-(
>Here is the latest participants list posting:

This is *real* interesting because I got this a few days ago on the ISOC
members list. (Yes, I also signed up with their Lyris mailer-list, yet
another ...<sigh>)

What is ever more interesting was the CC line on the ISOC message, it went
like this;

>CC: DNSO TRANSITION <transition@dnso.org>

Which indicates yet another mailer list to worry over.

Ayia! Don't these guys *ever* learn?

I'm working on DNSO.NET lists. At the moment, I'm up to my eye-balls in
SSLeay-0.9.0, building Certs(tm). Can someone toss me a LiveSaver(tm)? [I
can't resist sweet puns <grin>]

>Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 14:14:08 +0100
>To: participants@dnso.org
>From: "Lynn St.Amour" <st.amour@bluewin.ch>
>Subject: DNSO PROGRESS UPDATE
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>Please find below a memo outlining the next steps in the DNSO process.
>This has been driven by the Transition and Drafting teams and has been
>heavily influenced by comments from many of you.  It is our intent to
>distribute this to a wider audience as well as to post it on the DNSO
>web-site. 
>____________________________________________________________
>
>There have been many e-mails over the last few days re the next steps for
>the DNSO Application and this posting is an attempt to give some additional
>clarity.  We are very much committed to a representative, inclusive, open
>and transparent process and we recognize that we will need to manage this
>carefully if we are to meet the above goals as well as the filing deadline
>of February 5th, 1999.
>
>The current draft proposal (VERSION 7), see http://www.dnso.org , built
>from the items we had reached consensus on through the Barcelona and
>Monterrey meetings was published three weeks ago.  This will be revised (
>
>if necessary) to accommodate any legitimate points of disagreement re; the
>consensus reached via the meetings held to date.  A new revision ( if
>necessary, per the above) will be published on the 18th of January on the
>DNSO web-site.  The responsibilities of the drafting team appointed in
>Monterrey will end with this document in line with what was previously
>agreed.  All comments on these proposals should be sent to
>proposals@dnso.org as soon as possible to ensure that they are included.
>
>A number of additional substantive inputs to the proposal above have come
>(or are coming) from organizations such as ORSC, INTA, ICC, NSI, etc.  An
>open meeting has been scheduled by ICC, INTA and a number of other
>organizations, for the 22nd of January to try and integrate these into one
>proposal.  Therefore, the DNSO Transition team (working with other parties
>who have actively participated by submitting substantive comments),  has
>appointed a new drafting team to prepare a draft proposal for publication
>on the 12th of January.  It is expected that much of the review of this
>document will take place before the meeting on the 22nd.  All comments on
>this proposal should also be posted to proposals@dnso.org   In the case
>where new and substantive inputs are received from recognized
>organizations, an individual representing this organization may be asked to
>meet with the drafting team to clarify any positions or points of
>integration.  
>
>The drafting team is comprised of: David Maher, Kent Crispin, Theresa
>Swinehart, Antony Van Couvering and Eberhard Lisse.  Michael Heltzer of
>INTA has agreed to participate and act as an organizational point of
>contact for INTA as they have submitted substantive comments.  In order to
>take advantage of the knowledge institutionalized to date, as well as to
>ensure broader representation amongst stakeholders, and increase
>transparency, those individuals taking part in the previous drafting
>exercises will be kept on the drafting team as observers (Fay Howard,
>Amadeu Abril I Abril, Michael Schneider, Nii Quaynor, Kilnam Chon, Bill
>Semich, Olivier Muron). 
>
>There is a lot of work to be done given the tight deadline and it is
>expected that much of the integration work will be done prior to the
>meeting on the 22nd.  This way, the meeting can be used to reach consensus
>on what should be a small number of remaining open items. Progress will be
>posted periodically on the DNSO web-site and more information on the
>process and on next steps will be posted on the web-site in the coming days.
>
>We look forward to your comments and contributions and are confident that
>we will make the February 5th deadline.
>
>____________________________________________________________________________
>_______
>Lynn St. Amour  Office phone :+41 (0)22 929 5786  Mobile :+41 (0)79 202 3127
>Internet Society, Executive Director - Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA)
>
>Make your plans now for:
>NDSS'99, San Diego, California;  Feb. 4-5, 1999 <http://www.isoc.org/ndss99>
>INET'99, San Jose, California; June 22-25, 1999 <http://www.isoc.org/inet99>
>____________________________________________________________________________
>________
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>To receive the digest version instead, send a
>blank email to ifwp-digest@lists.interactivehq.org
>
>To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
>subscribe-IFWP@lists.interactivehq.org
>
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
>unsubscribe-ifwp@lists.interactivehq.org
>
>Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email andy@interactivehq.org.
>___END____________________________________________


___________________________________________________ 
Roeland M.J. Meyer - 
e-mail:                                      mailto:rmeyer@mhsc.com
Internet phone:                                hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com
Personal web pages:             http://staff.mhsc.com/~rmeyer
Company web-site:                           http://www.mhsc.com
___________________________________________________ 
I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing...
                -- Thomas Jefferson