Re: [ifwp] Re: DNSO Important update: The "Merged" Draft

[Jay Fenello <Jay@Iperdome.com>]

Damn Michael,

Even though I've been called a cyber-cowboy,
at least I keep my 6-shooter holstered until 
I have something to shoot at ;-)


At 1/19/99, 05:13 AM, Michael Sondow wrote:
>Jay Fenello a écrit:
>
>> I've only read up to the point clipped below,
>> but if the intro is any indication, this is
>> going to be a very impressive document.
>
>What is this, diplomacy? Jay Fenello, the mediator, friend to all?


No, this is a compliment for an *introduction*
that is extremely well written.  Do you disagree?


>You like this draft, Jay? You approve of the corporate takeover? No open
>books? No membership control of the NC? You agree with that?


Do I like this draft?  I haven't even read this 
draft!  (I hate reading by-laws)

But in case there is any question, I am against 
corporate takeovers, I am against closed books, 
and I am against *token* memberships.  


>You're going to be real popular on Thursday with the suits. They'll probably
>give you a job running errands for them.
>
>The DNSO.org draft sucks. What's more, it's the work of one person: Kent
>Crispin. The Monterrey participants never agreed to anything like this
>draft, and none of them have responded to a call for comments. Maybe they're
>just quietly accepting it, but I think they're plain disgusted. I certainly
>hope so, anyway. Because it's a disgusting document. And their not going to
>get away with it. No way. 


Michael, you were one of DNSO.org's most vocal 
supporters.  You went to Monterey, and you were 
on several of DNSO.org's closed lists.  So what 
happened?  Aren't you at least partially 
responsible for the current draft?

Why are you taking your frustrations out on me?


>Defend it at your own risk.


I have done no such thing.

Jay.