[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dnso.discuss] Re: Flawed Drafts submitted to ICANN
- Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 20:15:27 +0000
- From: jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Subject: Re: [dnso.discuss] Re: Flawed Drafts submitted to ICANN
Stef and all,
NO or DISAGREE> We have already submitted our suggested
amendments.
Einar Stefferud wrote:
> Look All Y'All --
>
> The bottom line is, do you AGREE or DISAGREE with the CONTENT of the
> PARIS DRAFT?
>
> If you AGREE, then please jsut say YES.
>
> If you DISAGREE, Please say NO, PLUS
> PLease say why and offer new text to fix the draft.
>
> All arguments at this point apobut the porcess for birthing the PARIS
> draft are pretty much MOOT, unles you are just trying to negate the
> progress that it represents.
>
> Frankly, I wnat to spend my limited time to work on fixing what is
> wrong with it, in a public discussion forum, than to rehash where it
> came from.
>
> Frankly, it came from melding a bunch of unlikely stuff, and rehashing
> it all yet again only makes us look back on that awful mess that the
> PARIS DRAFT somehow arose from.
>
> In my book, this shows that self organizing complexity arises more
> easily from CHAOS than from ORDER. As you are noting, the
> circumstances surrounding the PARIS meeting were really chaotic, and
> the fact of being chaotic was no doubt a contributing factor in the
> birth of the PARIS DRAFT.
>
> So, lets just go forward from here...\Stef
>
> >From your message Sun, 07 Feb 1999 15:12:07 -0500:
> }
> }Esther Dyson a =E9crit:
> }
> }> Isn't the DNSO itself a form of "forced arbitration" - or " at least >=
> } a committee to come up with some alternatives, some radical > alternativ=
> }es"?
> }
> }I would hope so. But there's a tendency afoot for people and groups to
> }equivocate their opinions and policies in order to seem to be arriving at=
> } a
> }"consensus". This may be necessary temporarily in order to include all
> }constituencies equitably in the DNSO's membership, but it won't have been
> }useful to institutionalize compromise, before it has been reached, in
> }articles or bylaws. These should be for mechanisms to resolve the
> }differences, not statements that they don't exist.
>
> ---
> You are subscribed to dnso.discuss as: [jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com]
> To unsubscribe, change your list options, or view archives go to:
> http://lists.association.org/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=dnso.discuss
> This list system donated by Lyris Technologies (http://www.lyris.com/).
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208