[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dnso.discuss] Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN & DNSO



Michael and all,

  You are right here IMHO.  But it seems reasonable to assume that
both shared and non-shared gTLD's can coexist.  If not, why not?
I have yet to see an answer to that question that is logical to date.

Michael Dillon wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Einar Stefferud wrote:
>
> > }>            "IF YOUR PROBLEM SEEMS UNSOLVABLE,
> > }>             CONSIDER THAT YOU MAY HAVE A META PROBLEM".
>
> The meta-problem is that some people are determined that we should have
> new privately-owned TLDs and other are determined that all new non-ccTLDs
> should be shared TLDs so that domain name owners are not locked in to a
> service provider in the same way that they are now locked in to NSI.
>
> And the meta-meta-problem is that there is no overreaching authority that
> can make a decision on the meta-problem or enforce and arbitrated solution
> to that problem. Therefore the problem must simmer and boil until it
> becomes large enough to gain public attention. Once general public opinion
> is known, more people will have the courage to push the r4esolution of the
> problem in the direction that the public wants it to go.
>
> --
> Michael Dillon                 -               E-mail: michael@memra.com
> Check the website for my Internet World articles -  http://www.memra.com
>
> ---
> You are subscribed to dnso.discuss as: [jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com]
> To unsubscribe, change your list options, or view archives go to:
> http://lists.association.org/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=dnso.discuss
> This list system donated by Lyris Technologies (http://www.lyris.com/).

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208