Re: Yet another John Charles Broomfield? How many are there? Re: jbroom@MANTA.OUTREMER.COM,

[william@dso.net (William X. Walsh)]

On Sat, 17 Apr 1999 14:58:20 +0100, Jeff Williams
<jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>William and all,
>
>  As you well know or should know, I have posted several URLs for anyone's
>review several times before.  As you also well know, Wired, the LA Times,
>WSJ, and other internet based articles have mentioned/qouted me
>on several occasions as well.  Hence your attempt here to smear
>me yet again is in and of itself fraudulent behavior, yet again.
>The noose is getting tighter and tighter William...  I would quit while
>you still can.


Oh yes, we mention the Wired and LA Times on the Jeff W. website at
http://www.dso.net/wwalsh/jeffw/

And you know that both reporters in those cases retracted your quotes
after discovering that you were less than truthful with them.

You have never posted ANY URLs for INEG or INEG affiliates.

NEVER - NOT ONCE.



>
>William X. Walsh wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 17 Apr 1999 10:05:34 +0100, Jeff Williams
>> <jwkckid1@IX.NETCOM.COM> wrote:
>>
>> >Rik and all,
>> >
>> >  Be my guest.  However it still does not delineate the facts at all....
>> >
>> >Point being is that you can carry this stuff to extremes.  As it is
>> >in this instance (There have been several others on this list on
>> >this before, the last one started by Chris Ambler I believe), was
>> >started by JCB here.
>> >
>>
>> Point being this, Jeff.  Most people on this list would be willing to
>> provide even JUST ONE offer of proof they are who they say they are.
>> JUST ONE would be sufficient.  Their companies are either listed in
>> the telephone directories, have websites, are corporations easily
>> verified (amazing how easy it is to verify a corporation when they
>> really exist), are sole proprietors, etc.
>>
>> Whereas you won't provide even ONE, for yourself or INEG.
>>
>> Not even ONE.
>>
>> You claim INEG holds domains, please give us some examples.
>>
>> ANY offer of proof would be nice.  You've never been willing to
>> provide any.
>>
>> That is the difference here, and that is why it DOES delineate the
>> facts, and why we have no need to carry this to extremes.  No one is
>> asking for extreme proof.  Just something real simple, and real
>> public.
>>
>> And you won't even provide that.
>>
>> --
>> William X. Walsh william@dso.net
>> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
>>
>> NSI & Internic news http://www.dso.net/internic/
>
>Regards,


--
William X. Walsh william@dso.net
General Manager, DSo Internet Services

NSI & Internic news http://www.dso.net/internic/