Re: [IFWP] Re: Registrar Constituency meeting - Berlin

[william@dso.net (William X. Walsh)]

Amazing how Dr Lisse's position changes along with how the winds are
blowing......

I was supporting the ORBS system and he accuses me of "Censorship,"
then someone else says it shouldn't be used and he supports it use....

Is this under the "I'm just here to have fun" header?

On a side note, I think the ORBS system should be used, especially
with the fact that this list has been used for spam in the past.  ORBS
shouldn't be a problem for anyone on these lists.  If Jeffrey was who
he said he was, his multibillion dollar company would set it up for
him to use their mail servers.



On Sun, 23 May 1999 23:34:16 +0100, Dr Eberhard W Lisse
<el@linux.lisse.na> wrote:

>Christopher,
>
>In message <011001bea562$f1027240$7dc72599@vorlon>, "Christopher Ambler" writes:
>
>> While I personally agree with the ORBS system and what it is doing,
>> perhaps implementing it on a mailing list intended for public policy
>> discussion is not appropriate.
>
>I, for one, can dispense with your nonsense. If the mailing list is
>SPAMmed you'd be whining about it. If it is not, because it is
>protected, you are whining too.
>
>Where is Willie when we need him?
> 
>> While most posters could make the appropriate fixes to their mail
>> servers, I cannot help but wonder about someone who has no control
>> over their system or ISP and cannot, therefore, post (especially if
>> their ISP won't make the necessary changes). While it also may be
>> correct to say, "get another ISP that will," in this instance I
>> believe it is not appropriate.
>
>This is the DNSO we are talking about.  We *ARE* it!  Or supposed to
>be.
>
>Anyone not being able to sor out one's own DNS should be allowed in
>here!
>
>el