[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] What WG-B is supposed to be doing (RE: Arbitration)

To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: [wg-b] What WG-B is supposed to be doing (RE: Arbitration)
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 06:46:29 -0700
Cc: "DEUTSCH, SARAH B." <SARAH.B.DEUTSCH@bellatlantic.com>, wg-b@dnso.org
References: <199909231957.PAA08378@imr01.bellatlantic.com><4.2.0.58.19990924083128.033148a0@dokka.maxware.no>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

>>  There already appear to be plenty of "business opportunities" for
>> "entrepreneurs" who steal variations of famous marks at their own peril.
>> Bell Atlantic submitted documented evidence of the more than 1000 domain
>> name infringements we experienced for two of our marks in .com, .net and
>> .org.
> Do you have this online? URL?

hint: i am told that bell atlantic has been trying to convince courts that
anything with "bell" in infringes on their famous mark.

randy

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [wg-b] What WG-B is supposed to be doing (RE: Arbitration)
  - From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
- Re: [wg-b] What WG-B is supposed to be doing (RE: Arbitration)
  - From: Judith Oppenheimer <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>

References:
- [wg-b] RE: Arbitration (RE: (wg-b) food for thought)
  - From: "DEUTSCH, SARAH B." <SARAH.B.DEUTSCH@bellatlantic.com>
- [wg-b] What WG-B is supposed to be doing (RE: Arbitration)
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@alvestrand.no>

Prev by Date: [wg-b] What WG-B is supposed to be doing (RE: Arbitration)
Next by Date: RE: [wg-b] What WG-B is supposed to be doing (RE: Arbitration)
Prev by thread: [wg-b] What WG-B is supposed to be doing (RE: Arbitration)
Next by thread: RE: [wg-b] What WG-B is supposed to be doing (RE: Arbitration)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread