[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[wg-b] Re: WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection

To: wg-b@dnso.org
Subject: [wg-b] Re: WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection
From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 18:29:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19991006232337.00d40e80@dokka.maxware.no>
References: <3.0.2.32.19991005110932.00da54bc@pop.interport.net><F5119A1B56E2D2119B580008C7BF699F209381@mpaabeexchange.mpaa .org>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

 (they thought the name "touba" deserved
>    protection. Quick - how many know why? .-)

Famous mosque.

WIPO earlier rejected the idea of a protected name list (religions,
medicines, etc.) as too much of a can of worms at this time).





@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-b] Re: WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>

References:
- RE: [wg-b] Straw Vote Results
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>
- [wg-b] WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@alvestrand.no>

Prev by Date: [wg-b] WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection
Next by Date: [wg-b] "ICANN has neither the authority nor the resources" - Mike Roberts
Prev by thread: [wg-b] WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection
Next by thread: Re: [wg-b] Re: WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread