[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] technical charter, no broader authority

To: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-b] technical charter, no broader authority
From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 13:29:56 -0400
CC: "'Judith Oppenheimer'" <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>, wg-b@dnso.org
References: <6751E347E374D211857100A0C92563DC637995@MAILDC>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

Since trademark infringement is basically a form of consumer fraud, I think you
can complete the syllogism.

Why the double standard?

--MM

Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:

> I must be missing something. I took Mike's comments to be about dealing with
> consumer fraud, and would strongly support his statement. What am I missing
> here?

References:
- RE: [wg-b] technical charter, no broader authority
  - From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-b] technical charter, no broader authority
Next by Date: Re: [wg-b] technical charter, no broader authority
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-b] technical charter, no broader authority
Next by thread: RE: [wg-b] technical charter, no broader authority
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread