RE: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

But I don't see where ANY of it is enforcable. This is a critical issue.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-b@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-b@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> Milton Mueller
> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 1999 4:10 PM
> To: d3nnis
> Cc: Esther Dyson; wg-b@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate
> 
> 
> Dennis:
> You are beginning to get a handle on what ICANN is all about.
> 
> d3nnis wrote:
> 
> > By  issuing it as a "policy" statement though, the Department of
> > Commerce has achieved the effect of creating new law which has
> > slipped out of the due process arena.  In addition, because it is
> > officially "not law", it is insulated from Constitutional challenges.
> 
> --
> m i l t o n   m u e l l e r // m u e l l e r @ s y r . e d u
> syracuse university          http://istweb.syr.edu/~mueller/
> 
>