Re: [wg-b] Re: Nature of answer to question B

["Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>]

Then we can assume that neither you nor Mr. Alverstrand will vote for
Option C, and that you are both in favor of a decently run UDRP.


At 05:07 PM 10/22/99 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>Martin B. Schwimmer wrote:
>
>> Harald Alverstrand wrote:
>
>> >- UDRP will significantly reduce the cost to the "famous mark" holders of
>> >   protecting their marks against clear cases of cyberpiracy compared to
>> >   the curent situation
>>
>> Is your goal to increase the cost?
>
>No, Harald is simply pointing out that most of the work that needs to be
done is
>accomplished already by a UDRP. Harald's view about the UDRP was supported
by the
>opinion of a well-known trademark lawyer. On September 3, that trademark
lawyer
>said:
>
>"My problem with the exclusion is that it seems to provide little marginal
>improvement
>over a decently-run UDRP."
>
>http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-b/Archives/msg00044.html
>
>The name of that trademark lawyer? Martin Schwimmer.
>
>
>
>

@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @