[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] Voting Results and What We Do Next

To: mpalage@infonetworks.com
Subject: Re: [wg-b] Voting Results and What We Do Next
From: mark@bitshift.org
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 07:01:25 -0700
cc: wg-b@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:06:32 EDT." <000501bf1f67$7ccc0060$4501a8c0@mike>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org


Given this morning's story at:

           http://www.newsbytes.com/pubNews/99/138374.html

...which discusses a recent US Federal Appeals court ruling that
registrars cannot be held liable for the names they register, I'm
wondering whether the vote just completed would turn out a bit
differently?

True, it may only vary by a few votes.  But then, consensus was reached
by that same slim margin.

-- 
Mark C. Langston
mark@bitshift.org
Systems Admin
San Jose, CA

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-b] Voting Results and What We Do Next
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>

References:
- [wg-b] Voting Results and What We Do Next
  - From: "Michael D. Palage" <mpalage@infonetworks.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-b] Voting Results and What We Do Next
Next by Date: Re: [wg-b] Voting Results and What We Do Next
Prev by thread: [wg-b] Voting Results and What We Do Next
Next by thread: Re: [wg-b] Voting Results and What We Do Next
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread