[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] US Statutorily Protected Marks

To: <mpalage@infonetworks.com>, <wg-b@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: [wg-b] US Statutorily Protected Marks
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 22:46:52 +0100
In-Reply-To: <000301bf377d$189634c0$4501a8c0@mike>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

At 14:41 25.11.99 -0500, Michael D. Palage wrote:
>Several participants have asked me about the list of statutorily protected
>marks under US Federal Law. The following is a "partial" list obtained from
>the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure - Section 1900.
>http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/tac/tmep/1900.htm

Thank you - this makes the point that US statutorily protected marks do not 
necessarily meet the Paris/TRIPS criteria for "famous marks" more 
eloquently than any logical argument!

"Smokey Bear" indeed!

                      Harald A

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-b] US Statutorily Protected Marks
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
- RE: [wg-b] US Statutorily Protected Marks
  - From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>

References:
- [wg-b] US Statutorily Protected Marks
  - From: "Michael D. Palage" <mpalage@infonetworks.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-b] US Statutorily Protected Marks
Next by Date: Re: [wg-b] Famous Third-Level Domains
Prev by thread: [wg-b] US Statutorily Protected Marks
Next by thread: Re: [wg-b] US Statutorily Protected Marks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread