[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-b] No protections for common words
I agree-- and expand. We must also allow ever **subsequent,** registered,
non-diluting, domain name to be used. In that way, we will protect the
words that are being used in noncommercial and generic ways, and for
nonconflicting categories of goods and services. -kathy
>
> I think this is an extremely important point. Even if
> a "common word(s) or expression" has been trademarked,
> we must allow a prior registered, non-diluting, domain
> owned and used by someone other than the trademark
> holder to stand. I use "non diluting" in the sense
> that the domain and use (site) cannot refer to the
> same subject as the trademerk.