[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] How would .fame work?

To: measday@josmarian.ch, rmeyer@mhsc.com
Subject: Re: [wg-b] How would .fame work?
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 14:19:58 +0100
Cc: "wg-b@dnso.org" <wg-b@dnso.org>
In-Reply-To: <3858B0ED.E7C9ECD1@josmarian.ch>
References: <026f01bf46fe$1f28d370$ecaf6cc7@lvrmr.mhsc.com>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

At 10:29 16.12.99 +0100, Mark Measday wrote:
>I don't think the Higgs paper covered (i) the costs of monitoring the
>exclusions in other tlds and (ii) fitting the classes of famous, well-known
>and national marks into other tlds. The costs of getting .com holders to
>switch to .fame (or something better) are enormous, unless it is some
>technical fix mandated by the TM fraternity. What comments could be made on
>this now?
repeat until bored:

NOBODY WILL SWITCH FROM .COM TO .FAME.

The listing in .fame is ADDITIONAL to listing in .com

                   Harald A

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [wg-b] How would .fame work?
  - From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>

References:
- RE: [wg-b] How would .fame work?
  - From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
- Re: [wg-b] How would .fame work?
  - From: Mark Measday <measday@josmarian.ch>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-b] Points of agreement
Next by Date: RE: [wg-b] How would .fame work?
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-b] How would .fame work?
Next by thread: RE: [wg-b] How would .fame work?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread