[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] .UNION Top-level domain name

To: wg-b@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-b] .UNION Top-level domain name
From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:03:12 -0500
In-Reply-To: <v04220815b50482105519@[207.87.121.71]>
References: <v01530501010de2939e4e@[209.122.228.124]><v01530501010de2939e4e@[209.122.228.124]>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

>>  But rather, if
>>  >there exist charted TLDs, like .union, .isnotfair, or .ecology, can they
>>  >be used in connection with a product, organization or company name?
>>  >For example, would boeing.union, exxon.union, cocacola.union,
>>  >volvo.union and similar names be permitted without the permission of
>>  >Boeing, Exxon, Cocacola, Volvo, etc?
>>  >
>>  >    I think the answer should be a clear yes.
>>  >
>>
>>
>>Please brief us on the law, citing cases.
>
>Let's try the Lanham Act and the US constitution for starters?
>


Citing cases.

@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-b] .UNION Top-level domain name
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
- Re: [wg-b] .UNION Top-level domain name
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>

References:
- Re: [wg-b] .UNION Top-level domain name
  - From: martys@interport.net
- Re: [wg-b] .UNION Top-level domain name
  - From: martys@interport.net
- Re: [wg-b] .UNION Top-level domain name
  - From: Mikki Barry <ooblick@netpolicy.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-b] Setting the Record Straight
Next by Date: Re: [wg-b] .UNION Top-level domain name
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-b] .UNION Top-level domain name
Next by thread: Re: [wg-b] .UNION Top-level domain name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread