[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] Protections for Noncommercial gTLDs.

To: wg-b@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-b] Protections for Noncommercial gTLDs.
From: "Mark C. Langston" <mark@bitshift.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 10:12:38 -0700
In-Reply-To: <3.0.2.32.20000417130634.00e12208@pop.interport.net>; from martys@interport.net on Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 01:06:34PM -0400
References: <3.0.2.32.20000416112740.00e09214@pop.interport.net> <Pine.LNX.4.04.10004161320550.23698-100000@milan.essential. org> <3.0.2.32.20000417130634.00e12208@pop.interport.net>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 01:06:34PM -0400, Martin B. Schwimmer wrote:
> The use and ownership of generalmotors.union by an entity not connected
> with or endorsed by General Motors may  be held to be an infringing use.
> Brach van Houten Holding v. Save Brach's Coalition, 856 F. Supp. 472, 31
> USPQ2d 1786 (ND Ill 1994).

The and ownership of generalmotors.union by an entity which is a union
within, affiliated with, or otherwise associated with General Motors may be
viewed as obviously noninfringing.
Common sense.

-- 
Mark C. Langston
mark@bitshift.org
Systems & Network Admin
San Jose, CA

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-b] Protections for Noncommercial gTLDs.
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>

References:
- Re: [wg-b] Protections for Noncommercial gTLDs.
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>
- Re: [wg-b] Protections for Noncommercial gTLDs.
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>
- Re: [wg-b] Protections for Noncommercial gTLDs.
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>

Prev by Date: [wg-b] Input to wg-b report
Next by Date: [wg-b] WG-B Report
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-b] Protections for Noncommercial gTLDs.
Next by thread: Re: [wg-b] Protections for Noncommercial gTLDs.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread