[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TM Sunrise +20 (Re: [wg-b] WG-B Report -Take II)

To: <wg-b@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: TM Sunrise +20 (Re: [wg-b] WG-B Report -Take II)
From: "John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <john@johnberryhill.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:10:15 -0400
References: <0B50DCAF2448D311BA0300805F3198593E5EF5@NS_MSG_P1.nabisco.com>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org


How, in your view, does the sunrise proposal fairly and reasonably balance
the desire of a fraternity to use the term "pledge" in a domain name, with
the perpetual pre-emptive right thereby given to S.C. Johnson Wax to
pre-emptively register the word "pledge" and 20 variations thereof in every
new TLD?

From: Hartman, Steve <HartmanS@Nabisco.com>
> I support the sunrise proposal as a fair and reasonable balance of the
> trademark and non trademark interests in domain name ownership.

Follow-Ups:
- [wg-b] Comments on TM Sunrise +20 (-20)
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>

References:
- RE: TM Sunrise +20 (Re: [wg-b] WG-B Report -Take II)
  - From: "Hartman, Steve" <HartmanS@Nabisco.com>

Prev by Date: [wg-b] RE: [registrars] Re: [council] suggested draft resolution for today's NC call
Next by Date: RE: TM Sunrise +20 (Re: [wg-b] WG-B Report -Take II)
Prev by thread: RE: TM Sunrise +20 (Re: [wg-b] WG-B Report -Take II)
Next by thread: [wg-b] Comments on TM Sunrise +20 (-20)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread