Re: [wg-c-1] Wecome to Drafting Committee 1

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>]

I respect your vested interest in this process Christopher, however without
discussion, it is impossible for this process to move forward. Deeming the
exploration of the ramifications of this question inappropriate not only
limits the effectiveness of this process, but does a serious disservice to
the interests represented by the WG and our responsibility to the entire
network.

Ross Wm. Rader
TUCOWS/Domain Direct

----- Original Message -----
From: Christopher Ambler <cambler@iodesign.com>
To: <wg-c-1@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 1999 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [wg-c-1] Wecome to Drafting Committee 1


> > b) What should the new gTLDs, if any, be?
>
> This question is wholly inappropriate. This group should not be in the
> position to determine the actual TLD names. This is a business decision
> on the part of the registry. This group should be concerned with the
> operational parameters of adding new gTLDs, reasonable limits to
> avoid technical problems, and reasonable criteria to avoid overloading.
>
> Christopher
>