Re: [wg-c] definitions

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 06:14:08PM -0400, Craig Simon wrote:
> I'd suggest we put aside the value-laden issue of competition and use a
> more neutral definition for aTLD ... 

Then would you classify my ".kjc", ".tld", ".grs", and ".web" zones
as aTLDs.  (Yes, I have a .web as well.  Do you wish it to be
considered in the same class as IODesign's? I'm a little
uncomfortable in doing that.) It does seem to me that an essential
characteristic of the alt TLDs is that they are intended to be "real"
TLDs, in "real" root zones, and not just tests of fun and games. 

But OK.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain