[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"

To: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>, Craig Simon <cls@flywheel.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
From: dwmaher@ibm.net
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 16:32:14 -0500
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <379233DF.339FFF58@syr.edu>
References: <09122861000009@acalauditores.es><378FFB7E.3A50B339@syr.edu><19990716223527.D21303@songbird.com><37905D83.676DA4F9@flywheel.com><3790FEA1.3F346266@syr.edu><37922AAD.CEF66DF7@flywheel.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At 04:06 PM 7/18/99 -0400, Milton Mueller wrote:
[clip]
>What's the big deal? How did we decide how many TV channels would be 
>allocated to
>PBS and which would be licensed to commercial companies? How did we decide 
>which
>land would be set aside for national parks and which would be sold to real 
>estate
>developers? Is there something unprecedented here that I'm missing?
      For the former, we had the FCC and for the latter, we had Congress. I
don't think the Internet has either (yet).
David Maher

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>

References:
- [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
- Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  - From: Craig Simon <cls@flywheel.com>
- Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
- Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  - From: Craig Simon <cls@flywheel.com>
- Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>

Prev by Date: Geographical management of new gTLDs? (was Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus" )
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread