Re: [wg-c] ICANN hearings and WGC timetable

["Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>]

On 22 July 1999, Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:

[...]

>
>I suggest, therefore, that this Working Group look toward the
>November ICANN meeting in Los Angeles as a goal for completing
>its report to the Names Council. We should plan to hold a
>face-to-face meeting at that time to complete the report.
>Indeed, I don't think we have any choice about whether we move
>faster than that. Even in November, there is a good chance the
>report will have to wait until At-Large members are elected
>before any gTLD policy is adopted.

[...]

Using the same reasoning, I suggest that we should submit our
report to a fully-formed Names Council, and not the preliminary one
now seated.

This does not necessarily mean an additonal delay.  There has 
already been the suggestion that there will be a permanent NC by
this date.  It merely imposes another constraint on the submission
date.  

-- 
Mark C. Langston	     			Let your voice be heard:
mark@bitshift.org				     http://www.idno.org
Systems Admin					    http://www.icann.org
San Jose, CA					     http://www.dnso.org