Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@dninet.net>]

it is truly a sad shame that more efforts here appear to be oriented towards
trying to appoint and defend  "chair" & "co-chair"  positions of this
working group than towards the achieving specific mandate of this group.

as support to this position i would like to point out that of the last 41
postings to this list , 37 have been in regards to the "chair discussion".
this is, to say the least,  NOT GOOD !!

you  know it might be best to just eliminate the chair position on these
working groups and have the group appoint a spokesman whose job it is to
present the consensus report for each group. i also strongly recommend that
minority positions be allowed to place into the written record along with
the consensus reports thier respective objections or concerns.

i feel that a responsible group should be able to appoint a spokesman to
present both position without unecessary petty bickering.  hopefully someone
else might consider this line of reasoning rational...

could i possibly have a humm.... on this

ken stubbs