Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal

["Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>]

On 29 July 1999, "Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com> wrote:

> Hence I return to my old point for Mr. Langston: how do we get from
>the well- known rules requiring TM holders to police their marks to
>the conclusion that a regi stry may not filter proposed registrations
>against an exclusion list?  Really, this is new learning to me, and I
>am truly anxious to learn more about it as well as to discover th e
>provenance of this position.

Are they willing to pay for the pivilege?

-- 
Mark C. Langston	     			Let your voice be heard:
mark@bitshift.org				     http://www.idno.org
Systems Admin					    http://www.icann.org
San Jose, CA					     http://www.dnso.org