[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal

To: "Rita M. Odin" <OdinR@arentfox.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 16:58:03 -0400
CC: wg-c@dnso.org
References: <s7a19f38.073@arentfox.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

I would like to hear from Rita and other IP lawyers on the list why they think any new gTLDs should be added. Is it merely a concession to the demands from other interests, or do you see any positive value in adding new TLDs? If you do see a value, what is it?

Rita M. Odin wrote:

> I am not arguing against *any expansion,* I am merely attempting to explain the issues with which IP owners are confronted and why they think it is necessary to take a slow, measured approach to adding gTLDs.  Perhaps, in light of the recent discussion (and your proposed solution below), you can see why it matters whether 1 or 100 new gTLDs are added?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread