[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal

To: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
From: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 16:43:18 -0700
cc: wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 30 Jul 1999 18:36:41 EDT." <3.0.2.32.19990730183641.00cf581c@pop.interport.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org


On 30 July 1999, "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net> wrote:
>
>And as to your remarks regarding the irrelevancy of DNs due to the use of
>search engines, would you then agree to a single new TLD consisting
>entirely of numerical addresses?  If not, why not?


We have those already.  They're called IP addresses.
I'm perfectly happy with IP addresses.

-- 
Mark C. Langston	     			Let your voice be heard:
mark@bitshift.org				     http://www.idno.org
Systems Admin					    http://www.icann.org
San Jose, CA					     http://www.dnso.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  - From: Onno Hovers <onno@surfer.xs4all.nl>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread