[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues

To: mueller@syr.edu, wg-c@dnso.org, Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues
From: dwmaher@ibm.net
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 15:28:52 -0500
In-Reply-To: <37A482E5.73E8EF1B@syr.edu>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At 01:24 PM 8/1/99 -0400, Milton Mueller wrote:
[clip]
>Is there *any* precedent, *anywhere* in which governments or
>regulators have drastically limited entry into a market for
>LEGAL goods and services, solely for the purpose of making it
>easier or cheaper for IP owners to protect their rights?

17 USC Ch.10 (Secs. 1001-1010) Digital Audio Recording Devices and Media

References:
- [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues
Prev by thread: [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread