[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs

To: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>, <wg-c@dnso.org>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:21:00 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <199908022202.PAA03694@agamemnon.home.com>
Reply-To: <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On 
> Behalf Of Mark
> C. Langston
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 1999 3:02 PM

> I haven't even seen any contingency plans or back-out paths.

What?!? You want contingiency rool-backs?!?!? <grin>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  - From: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Chartered TLDs and gTLDs
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
Next by thread: RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread